Sebenzana APP launches engineer recruitment drive with fun viral video

Energy and industrial asset performance experts, Sebenzana APP, have launched an engineer recruitment drive with the release of an online video that makes a lighthearted comparison between the amount of time the average person will spend in their lifetime on different tasks compared to work – and it turns out that while the average person will spend 30 hours crying, five weeks arguing, five years in queues and over eight years shopping, more than 13 years and two months will be spent entirely at work.

The video advises that since you will spend so much time at work, it’s best to choose your career wisely – before providing key advantages as to why experienced critical infrastructure engineers should apply to join Sebenzana APP.

“Globally there is a shortage of qualified and experienced service engineers and in Africa, this shortage is often frustrated further by engineers that are lured by the prospect of international opportunities,” says Andrew Carr, Managing Director, Sebenzana APP.

“So we’re on the hunt for Africa’s best energy and industrial service and related engineers and metallurgists who are committed to making a real impact in their careers. As the video points out, it helps that we’re are on the cutting edge of where technology, engineering and critical assets meet, have exciting opportunities and projects in Africa and are also growing rapidly internationally,” Carr concludes.

Commission of inquiry could lead us out of power crisis

Business Day Live – SA FACES its worse power crisis in 40 years. Eskom has now admitted in Parliament that, after five years of electricity shortages, we are likely to face another five. A decade of power constraints will cripple aspirations to grow our economy.

We need to understand how this crisis emerged and how we can fix it; we need a commission of inquiry to consider deep-rooted power sector reforms.

The realisation that Eskom cannot fix the power crisis anytime soon is dawning slowly on the government. Eskom was seen as integral to the developmental state, and its mega coal power stations — Medupi and Kusile — were meant to power the economy into the future. However, we now know that these new power units are years late, way over budget, and are constraining rather than facilitating economic development.

R7.8 billion debt recovery from increased tariffs in 2015/16 for Eskom

ESI Africa – South African electricity tariffs are set to increase on average by 12.69% on 1 April 2015 for consumers who purchase directly from the state-owned power utility, Eskom. Municipal consumers will pay the increased tariff from 1 July 2015 after the bulk purchase price increase has been factored into the retail tariffs.

The increase was announced by the electricity regulator, Nersa, this week to implement its earlier decision to grant Eskom additional R7.8 billion revenue from electricity tariffs, over only one year.

Local industrial cogeneration ignored while Eskom grid falters

Plans to alleviate South Africa’s power problems hit another snag this week when a leading business newspaper revealed that bringing new power into the national grid through the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPP) hit a technical obstacle – Eskom lacks the infrastructure to connect many of the recently selected renewable energy independent power producer projects until their grid is strengthened.

“The problem is that the majority of winning bids are solar and wind energy projects. These projects sound great and are lobbied by high-profile, powerful pressure groups – but developers typically locate them where the sun shines or wind blows the most,” says Andrew Carr, managing director of independent engineering consultancy, Sebenzana.

As a result, wind or solar generation projects tend to be located in areas where traditionally the industrial loads are low and hence the Eskom grid is relatively “light”. This is in direct contrast to cogeneration and industrial embedded power generation projects waiting to happen across the country. These projects, which have been largely neglected until now, typically sit adjacent to existing industrial loads and many are in a position to use grid infrastructure already in place.

“As good as renewable energy projects are in the long term, South Africa’s energy needs are immediately critical, and the emphasis should be placed on generation that can be implemented rapidly from areas that already have a robust Eskom infrastructure,” says Carr. “South Africa’s power problems could be substantially alleviated through ‘cogeneration’ projects, where industry generates its own electricity and passes surplus power on to the national grid,” he continues.

Cogeneration offers a number of distinct advantages over other IPP opportunities:

  • Generally, cogeneration projects have the shortest development lead times to deliver electricity to the grid – many within an eighteen-month to thirty-month time horizon
  • Since industry is already located in high-demand electricity areas, Eskom’s existing infrastructure is already sufficient and does not need to be strengthened
  • The electricity generated is often consumed near the point of generation – minimising electricity losses due to transmission and distribution
  • While cogeneration is not a renewable energy, it is highly energy efficient and reduces carbon emissions relative to electricity generated

“South Africa has large players in the resource, manufacturing, sugar and paper and pulp sectors ideally positioned to invest in cogeneration projects,” says Carr. “These projects would typically generate electricity for the host site, reducing transmission losses. Surplus electricity can then be supplied into Eskom’s grid,” he continues.

Industry players estimate that between 800 and 2 000 megawatts of cogeneration opportunities are available, but efforts to invest in cogeneration projects are hampered by a lack of an effective long-term procurement process. The long-term viability of cogeneration projects for industry relies on the assurance that in ten or fifteen years they will still have the opportunity to sell their surplus electricity back into the national grid.

“It’s tremendously frustrating for industry knowing that there are solutions that can rapidly alleviate pressure on the national grid, and yet see those solutions stymied by a lack of effective legislation or procurement processes,” Carr concludes.

Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Consent to display content from - Youtube
Consent to display content from - Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from - Google